News (Updated October 4, 2009)

[Home]  [
Previous news]


ANALYSIS-AIDS vaccine works, but back to the drawing board

28 Sep 2009 17:14:36 GMT

Source: Reuters

* Scientists confused by AIDS vaccine results

* Companies and non-profits want to analyze the data

* Advocates see billion-dollar market for HIV vaccine

By Maggie Fox, Health and Science Editor

WASHINGTON, Sept 28 (Reuters) - More than 25 years into the AIDS pandemic, scientists finally have a vaccine that protects some people -- but instead of celebrating, they are going back to the drawing board.

The vaccine, a combination of two older vaccines, only lowered the infection rate by about a third after three years among 16,000 ordinary Thai volunteers. Vaccines need to be at least 50 percent effective, and usually 70 to 80 percent effective, to be useful.

Worse, no one knows why it worked.

"Additional studies are clearly needed to understand how this vaccine regimen reduced the risk of HIV infection," Dr. Eric Schoomaker, surgeon general of the U.S. Army, which helped pay for the study, told reporters.

Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, said, "We need to bring the best minds together and map the way forward."

The vaccine is a combination of Sanofi-Pasteur's <SASY.PA> ALVAC canarypox/HIV vaccine, which includes synthetic versions of three HIV genes, and the failed HIV vaccine AIDSVAX, made by a San Francisco company called VaxGen and now owned by the nonprofit Global Solutions for Infectious Diseases.

"It is likely that significant efforts will be needed to fully understand the study results and to appreciate how they will inform the next steps to develop and deliver a safe and effective HIV vaccine," Dr. Peter Kim, president of Merck Research Laboratories <MRK.N>, said in a statement.

Merck's first AIDS vaccine failed in 2007.

"I am not sure this will encourage companies to immediately jump in," said Mitchell Warren of the non-profit AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition.

"What we hear from pharma and from small biotechs is that they are fascinated by an AIDS vaccine but as a business proposition, it is too risky."

The Thai trial may help them re-evaluate, Warren said.

MAKING A BETTER ONE

But first, some scientific direction is necessary.

"What is needed there is more in-depth analysis, to extend these findings, doing both clinical (human) and preclinical (animal) studies to find out why it is working and how we can make it better," Jim Tartaglia, vice president of research and development at Sanofi, told reporters.

Companies and non-profits along with governments have been working to make a vaccine against the human immunodeficiency virus that causes AIDS. The fatal and incurable virus has killed 25 million people and infects 33 million now.

Experts agree that a vaccine is the only way to conquer it, but the virus mutates unbelievably fast, can hide from the immune system and attacks the very cells sent to battle it.

To work, any HIV vaccine would have to activate both arms of the immune system -- the antibodies that home in on invaders such as viruses to neutralize them, and the T-cells that recognize and destroy viruses.

This vaccine did not appear to generate much of either response, and yet prevented infection 30 percent of the time.

Even more confusing, among the 51 people who were vaccinated but were infected anyway, the virus thrived just as well as it did among unvaccinated HIV patients. Researchers would not have expected that -- they would have expected the vaccine to at least make the infection less serious, as influenza vaccines do, for example.

Fauci wonders if the vaccines stimulated some component of the immune system that has been overlooked.

RENEWED HOPE

Dr. Donald Francis, a former government vaccine expert who helped develop AIDSVAX and who helped found Global Solutions for Infectious Diseases, said his team would be developing smaller studies to answer some of these questions. "We have a limited amount of vaccine now," Francis said.

The findings do offer renewed hope for finding a better vaccine. "There are now six approaches that look better than Merck's vaccine in the best of the animal models," said Dr. Seth Berkley, head of the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative, which funds studies.

IAVI believes the rewards could be substantial -- not just stopping the worst pandemic of our times, but financially.

"At its peak, an HIV vaccine could represent 5 percent to 13 percent of the total global vaccine market," IAVI estimates.

At $2 a dose for the developing world and $100 in richer countries, IAVI estimated companies might bring in $1.6 billion to $3.8 billion a year with an HIV vaccine.

Yet the private sector accounts for just 10 percent of all AIDS vaccine research and development funding, the group estimates. (Editing by Mohammad Zargham)

 

U.S. big pharma jumps back into flu business

Tuesday, September 29, 2009

A dearth of new products, new technologies and fresh commitments by governments scrambling to protect their populations from pandemic threats have lured U.S. drugmakers back into the flu vaccine business.

Three big U.S. pharmaceutical companies announced vaccine deals this week.

Johnson & Johnson , the world's largest healthcare company by market value, spent $444 million (278.5 million pounds) to buy a stake in Dutch biotech company Crucell as part of a new push into influenza vaccine and drug development.

Abbott Laboratories Inc spent $6.6 billion to buy the drugs unit of Belgium 's Solvay , including Solvay's Dutch cell-based flu vaccine production facility, which can make both seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccines.

And Merck & Co , already a vaccines powerhouse with its shingles and cervical cancer vaccines, got back into the U.S. flu market with a deal to distribute seasonal flu vaccine made by Australia 's CSL Ltd .

Although analysts say the deals are more strategic than game-changing, collectively they have infectious diseases experts heaving a sigh of relief.

"I am very pleased. For a while, a lot of vaccine manufactures simply disappeared," said Dr. Hildegund Ertl, who directs the vaccine centers at the Wistar Institute in Philadelphia .

"There was this attitude 20 years ago, 'Let's not worry about microbes. We've conquered them. Let's focus on cancer.' Then HIV came along. Then SARS came along. Then H5N1 (avian influenza) came along," she said.

Ertl said beginning with an outbreak of bird flu in Hong Kong in 1998, the United States and other governments started to offer grants to companies to develop new ways of making influenza vaccines.

That has continued with the current H1N1 swine flu pandemic that started in June. The U.S. government has committed $1.8 billion to companies to make a swine flu vaccine.

OUT TO GET US

"I think it's finally sinking into politicians' minds that maybe viruses and pathogens are out to get us and that our infrastructure has really gone to hell," Ertl said in a telephone interview.

"We have very few vaccine manufacturers in this country," she said, noting that companies like Wyeth , which is being acquired by Pfizer , dropped out of the flu vaccine market in the United States in 2002 because of high manufacturing costs and commodity pricing.

Five companies make swine flu vaccine for the U.S. market, all ultimately owned outside the United States -- AstraZeneca's MedImmune unit, CSL, GlaxoSmithKline , Novartis and Sanofi-Aventis .

"The government is now pitching in to try to get interest back, to have more manufacturers make vaccines," Ertl said.

Both Wyeth and Merck once made influenza vaccines in the United States using conventional egg-based technology.

"They decided it wasn't worth it," said Dr. Robert Balshe, director of Saint Louis University 's Centre for Vaccine Development. "But with new technologies and the rise in importance influenza vaccine, I think companies are revisiting that now."

For example, instead of chicken eggs, Solvay makes flu vaccine in cell culture, and Crucell is developing "flu-mAb," an antibody treatment meant to provide protection from all influenza A strains as well as to treat patients who are already infected.

Balshe said the United States is on the verge of recommending that all U.S. citizens get a flu shot. "We're at 270 million people who should get vaccinated. It's a big market. I think manufacturers are just now catching up."

John Sullivan, director of research and healthcare strategist at Leerink Swann, said all three deals reflect the fact that the pharmaceutical industry has too few products, but "lots of cash and lots of cash flow."

But he said the deals do suggest a change in direction.

"These deals indicate that infectious disease is perhaps moving up the list of what the managements of some big therapeutics companies care about," Sullivan said in a telephone interview.

He said the swine flu pandemic has made clear that governments are more willing to pay for products that protect their populations than before.

"If you look at some emerging countries -- Brazil , India , China -- governments are perceiving healthcare as a good that they can provide to their people, and they increasingly have enough money to do it."

(Editing by Maggie Fox and Cynthia Osterman)

 

Obama awards $5 billion for medical research

September 30, 2009

wpe5.jpg (14700 bytes)Obama made the announcement during a visit to the National Institutes of Health campus in Bethesda , outside Washington , saying the 12,000 grant awards would create tens of thousands of jobs over the next two years.

"We know that this kind of investment will also lead to new jobs: tens of thousands of jobs conducting research, manufacturing and supplying medical equipment, and building and modernizing laboratories and research facilities," Obama said in remarks released by the White House.

The awards will focus on medical and clinical research in several areas, including HIV-AIDS, (A) H1N1 Flu and cancer.

Obama's 787-billion-dollar stimulus plan passed by Congress in February, contains a mix of tax cuts and infrastructure spending, designed to create millions of jobs and pull the US economy out of recession.

 

US study: High rate of hepatitis among truckers

New Mexico Health Department study finds high rate of hepatitis C infections among truckers

LAS CRUCES , N.M. (AP) -- A study by the New Mexico Department of Health shows there are high rates of hepatitis C infection among truck drivers, and many of them aren't aware they have the disease.

The medical director for the department's Infectious Diseases Bureau, Steve Jenison, says studies in other countries have linked the spread of sexually transmitted disease to long distance truck drivers, but little is known about the industry in the United States .

Jenison says researchers learned that truckers passing through New Mexico don't have higher rates of sexually transmitted diseases, but there was a high rate of hepatitis C infection.

Researchers examined sexually transmitted infections, HIV and hepatitis B and hepatitis C virus prevalence and risk behaviors among 652 truck drivers at 11 truck stops in New Mexico between 2004 and 2006.

 

The bumpy road to universal ARV access

30 Sep 2009

JOHANNESBURG, 30 September 2009  - More than four million people globally are now on antiretroviral (ARV) treatment - a 10-fold jump in five years - but this is still less than half the people living with HIV who need it.

A new report, Towards Universal Access, was released on 30 September by the World Health Organization (WHO), UNAIDS and the UN Children's Agency (UNICEF), and is the third annual review of international progress towards the Millennium Development Goal of universal access to treatment and prevention by 2010.

At the end of 2007 about three million people were receiving life-prolonging ARV medication; in 2008 there was a 36 percent increase in people accessing treatment.

Dr Stella Anyangwe, the WHO country representative in South Africa , told journalists at a press conference that the biggest gains in providing treatment had been made in sub-Saharan Africa , the worst-affected region, and about 2.9 million people were now on ARVs, compared to about 2.1 million in 2007.

South Africa and Zimbabwe are among the countries that made the most progress in putting people on treatment in 2008, with both countries registering an increase of more than 50 percent from 2007 to 2008.

"Reaching the 700,000 mark [of people accessing ARVs] is something we hadn't really envisaged when we started providing treatment," admitted Dr Nono Simelela, CEO of the South African National AIDS Council. However, with an estimated five million people living with the virus - the highest caseload in the world - the country would have to "push really hard" to achieve universal access to treatment.

Anyangwe attributed the huge jump in global treatment access to a rise in the number of people being tested for HIV as well as lower drug prices, especially first-line treatment regimens, which had dropped by as much as 40 percent. The report noted that 94 of the 101 countries surveyed in 2008 were providing free HIV testing at public sector health facilities.

Despite these achievements there were still some major obstacles: people were still often tested at a late stage of the disease, and only accessed treatment when they were very ill and their immune systems could not recover. Also, "supply chain management is still an issue ... some countries are experiencing stock-outs [of drugs]," Anyangwe said.

One of her biggest concerns was the widening treatment gap - about 9.5 million people are in need of ARVs, but only 4 million are getting them. "At the rate we are going, with new [HIV] infections rising it will be almost impossible ... to keep providing free treatment to those who need it," she warned.

Countries should start looking at financing their own treatment programmes, rather than relying heavily on external funding. "If we keep people alive for longer ... then they may be able to buy their own treatment," she suggested.

Prevention still the weakest link

Despite the remarkable progress made towards achieving universal access to treatment, countries were still lagging behind when it came to prevention.

In 2008, 45 percent of pregnant women in low- and middle-income countries received treatment to prevent mother-to-child transmission, up from 35 percent in 2007, and far beyond the 10 percent reached in 2004.

However, the number of new infections was still extremely high. "Not enough is being done to balance two new infections for every person getting on treatment," said Mark Stirling, regional director of UNAIDS Eastern and Southern Africa , during the launch of the report.

More than 2.7 million people became newly infected in 2007 alone. Stirling called for more resources to be pumped into the prevention response, and for more "frank talk" from leaders about why so many new infections were occurring.

Nevertheless, most countries in East and Southern Africa had made a "quantum shift" towards universal access to prevention, and several countries in Southern Africa were pushing for male circumcision as a prevention measure to be rapidly scaled up.

Stirling noted that the prevention response was becoming "much more sophisticated than the ABC [Abstinence, Be faithful, Condomize] campaign of previous years", and national prevention strategies were now more focused on action.

Yet all too often vulnerable populations were still faced technical, legal and socio-cultural barriers when trying to access HIV/AIDS services. Only 30 countries provided needle- and syringe-exchange programmes for injecting drug users, and the number of syringes distributed annually by these programmes was still well below the internationally recommended target of 200 syringes per injecting drug user per year.

The report concluded that "Without significant acceleration in the rate at which services are expanded and people are reached, millions of new infections will occur, more lives will be lost, and the human and economic burden on future generations will continue to increase."

 

Rome conference on freeing children from HIV and TB

01 Oct 2009

Caritas Internationalis and the U.S. Embassy to the Holy See are holding a conference on preventing and combating AIDS and TB in young children in Rome , 14-16 October.

Up to 800 children die a day from AIDS-related illnesses such as TB. Many die in poor countries where a lack of money contributes to difficulties in diagnosing and treating children with HIV and in preventing transmission of the virus from their mothers.

Rev. Msgr. Robert J. Vitillo, Caritas Internationalis’ Special Advisor on HIV said, “An unacceptable number of children infected with HIV are dead before they reach their second birthday. The world must wake up to this terrible tragedy. It must invest money and expertise to keep HIV positive children alive.

“We need to help their mothers receive treatment so that they will not pass on the virus to their infants, we need to test children earlier, and we need “child friendlyâ€
medicines and dosages to keep these children healthy.â€

The conference will gather together leading voices from the UN, the Vatican, NGOs, drug companies and professionals dealing in AIDS child care to look at strategies to provide greater access to prevention, diagnosis and treatment for children with or at risk of HIV and TB.

U.S. Ambassador to the Holy See Miguel Diaz said, “The United States has undertaken a major commitment to combating HIV and AIDS in the developing world. The U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR) invests in paediatric AIDS programmes in poor countries to prevent transmission, among others, from mother to child. PEPFAR also works with host nations to provide family-centered treatment and care services for children living with and affected by HIV/AIDS. For these reasons, the U.S. Embassy to the Holy See is pleased to co-host this conference to highlight the importance of fighting HIV/AIDS in children.â€


Other co-sponsors of the conference are the Pontifical Council for Health Care Workers, UNAIDS, the World Health Organization Stop TB Department, the Stop TB Partnership, the Health Commission of the Unions of Superiors General and Rome’s Bambin Gesù Children’s Hospital.

“The co-sponsors of the conference have much influence from the highest corridors of power to the poorest communities. With this type of partnership we can make a great difference to the lives of children living with HIV,â€
says Msgr. Vitillo.

The event comes just ahead of the 20th anniversary of the Convention on the Rights of the Child in November, which states that every child has the right to life, the right to the highest attainable standard of health and access to health facilities.

Caritas Internationalis launched the HAART for Children campaign earlier this year to call for more action from governments and pharmaceutical companies to help save the lives of children with or at risk from HIV.

MSF calls on drug companies to pool HIV patents

30 Sep 2009

MSF and podcasts: The international medical humanitarian organisation, Mdecins Sans Frontires (MSF) is calling on nine of the world's largest pharmaceutical companies to help accelerate the availability of new treatments for millions of people living with HIV/AIDS by pooling their patents on a list of key HIV medicines.

A patent pool is a mechanism whereby a number of patents held by different parties are brought together and are made available to others for production or further development. The patent holders receive royalties paid by those using the patents. The mechanism has been instrumental in promoting innovation in industries such as aeronautics and digital telecommunications.

"It's a simple idea - companies share their knowledge in return for fair royalty payments," says Michelle Childs, Director of Policy & Advocacy at MSF's Campaign for Access to Essential Medicines. "But it has the potential to transform companies' approaches to access to HIV medicines and foster innovation in a way that marks an alternative to the confrontation and litigation of the past."

UNITAID, the international drug purchasing agency, is currently establishing a medicines patent pool for HIV drugs. Critical to its success will be the willingness of patent owners to participate by including their patent rights in the pool.

"The scheme is voluntary so companies have a choice, and today we're asking them to make that choice," says Childs. "This is an opportunity for these drug companies to demonstrate that they are genuinely committed to effective measures that allow access to life-saving medicines for people with HIV in developing countries. Some companies have expressed interest in the idea, but we need them to go further and put key patents in the pool."

For people living with HIV/AIDS, the impact could be considerable. A patent pool could speed up the availability of more affordable versions of new medicines, as generic production could begin well before the 20-year patent terms expire. Currently, patent barriers can also prevent innovation such as new paediatric formulations or much-needed fixed-dose combinations.

"This opportunity comes at a crucial time," says Dr. Eric Goemaere, medical coordinator for MSF in South Africa . "Many patients in our programmes have developed resistance to their medicines and need to switch to newer more effective drugs now. Because these are either unavailable or unaffordable, patients face a return to AIDS death row as treatment options dry up."

MSF is launching an e-mail writing campaign calling on Abbott Laboratories, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck & Co, Pfizer and Sequoia Pharmaceuticals to meet the promise afforded by this mechanism and put their HIV drug patents in the pool. The drugs that MSF identified to be essential for the pool based on its field experience are all recommended by the World Health Organization for use in developing countries.

Only selected MSF documents are posted on Alertnet.

 

Female Health's condom available, no US retail yet

01 Oct 2009

By Susan Heavey

WASHINGTON, Oct 1 (Reuters) - Female Health Co's <FHCO.O> new version of its female condom is now available to state health agencies and nonprofit organizations, but the company is still trying to make it more widely available in stores.

The condom, known as FC2, will cost about 30 percent less than the original version at less than a dollar apiece, the company said on Thursday.

FC2, approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in March, will be available at Washington, D.C.-area CVS stores in December, Female Health's senior strategic adviser Mary Ann Leeper told Reuters. Female Health is still seeking a marketing partner to help advertise and sell the product and is in talks with several companies, she added.

"We need the other company to really make a dent into the consumer market," she said.

The original female condom never had a large following in the United States , where consumers complained it made too much noise and spoiled intimacy. The FC2 uses a new, softer material that the company says is quieter and should be more acceptable.

But the female condom is used widely overseas, especially in countries hard-hit by HIV, where women see it as a way to protect themselves even if their male partners won't. The U.S. Agency for International Development, which lobbied for the FC2's approval, has said it plans to distribute it for global programs that aim to curb HIV.

U.S. state health departments and organizations such as Planned Parenthood can also buy it for their programs, which the company hopes will start to spread the word about the product's improvements.

While FC2 may face an uphill battle at the retail level, it could see greater use with its new lower price.

The original female condom retailed for as much as $4 each. The new material and manufacturing have lowered the price of the new version from distributors to no more than 82 cents per condom, the company said. Male condoms, available in a variety of brands and styles, can cost as little as 50 cents apiece.

Representatives for CVS Caremark Corp <CVS.N>, which operates CVS stores, could not be immediately reached for comment.

Shares of Female Health were down 5.7 percent to $4.76 in afternoon trading on Nasdaq. (Reporting by Susan Heavey; Editing by Tim Dobbyn and Gerald E. McCormick)


[Home]  [Previous news]