News (Updated February 21, 2010)

[Home]  [
Previous news]


Circumcision: What is in the foreskin anyway?

By Denis R. Buwembo

February 22 2010

On February 13, Saturday Monitor published an article; Male circumcision and HIV/Aids; Time to cut losses by Mr Gawaya Tegulle. The article is summarised as “people must be told that there is no need to loose your precious foreskin because you will die anyway. And Africans must be taught that we need to crosscheck every so-called solutions that our friends in the west prescribe, not swallow it wholesale. The fly that has no body to advise it follows the corpse to the grave.”

In the article Mr Gawaya alludes to the regrettable incidents of Yoanina Nanyonga and another one from Yumbe! These incidents clearly depict a picture of people desperate to live, due to a disease that they have acquired, some unfortunate but others through their ways of living. Surely a disease driving people to perform such deplorable acts can’t be ignored, but to compare the most recent male circumcision drive to such incidents is very regrettable.

For a very long time, science has urged that prevention is better than cure, making this phrase a cliché! Interestingly, Mr Gawaya is very right. Men circumcised or not will acquire HIV if their ways are not checked, but the rate at which this will happen will be very high for uncircumcised men. Men are not immortal, so the fact that we have to die is a no brainer! Faced with a plethora of competing causes of death in Africa; malaria, famine, rampant murders, and road traffic crashes etc, it is about time that we seriously think about ways to reverse or stop this trend of avoidable deaths, this calls for serious adherence to preventive methods.

In Africa, it must be noted that the majority of HIV infections are acquired through heterosexual intercourse, therefore it is not unusual that behaviour change measures (abstinence, being faithful, and using condoms) played an important part in Uganda’s success story of curbing the epidemic from a prevalence of nearly 30 per cent to 14 per cent or 12 per cent currently. Is this an acceptable situation that we should shelve all research about new ways to reduce new infections? Obviously not. Male circumcision is one of the oldest surgical operations in history, tracing roots in the bible and ancient paintings of male circumcision from Egypt clearly show that the practice is not foreign to Africa .
Keen observers of societies noted that most parts of north and west Africa, where male circumcision is common practice, HIV prevalence has been consistently low in most cases as low as 2.1 per cent ( Benin 1999 etc), This trend is a big contrast when you look at most east, central and south African countries where male circumcision rates are low but HIV prevalence very high (Swaziland 26 per cent 2006/7). This very big contrast, led researchers to subject male circumcision to the most rigorous test in science: Randomized control trials which consistently produced positive results showing the protective effect of male circumcision for HIV prevention. Does male circumcision give 100 per c ent protection against HIV acquisition for males? NO; research results show a protective effect of about 60 per cent. Those desirous of finding out how male circumcision provides this protective effect can log onto www.malecircumcsion.org.

Male circumcision combined with other methods “ABC”, if packaged very well will accord our people less risk of acquiring the deadly virus. Although male circumcision doesn’t seem to have primary benefits to the woman, it is argued that with a big number of HIV free men courtesy of being circumcised, fewer women will as a consequence be at risk of acquiring HIV, hence driving the epidemic to levels similar the other circumcising countries in Africa . Most of Europe is not a place where male circumcision is largely practiced, but we should also understand that there, the driver of the epidemic is not largely through heterosexual contact, but rather through intravenous drug abuse, therefore male circumcision may not play a leading role in the fight against HIV in places like these.

 

Kenya : Halt Anti-Gay Campaign

18 Feb 2010 Source: Human Rights Watch

( New York ) - Kenya's government should act quickly to protect people accused of homosexual conduct and groups offering HIV/AIDS services from vigilante attacks, Human Rights Watch said today in a letter to Kenyan authorities.


The vigilante violence has hit Mtwapa, a coastal town northeast of Mombasa , in recent days and appears to be spreading to Mombasa and elsewhere. Human Rights Watch called on Kenya 's government to speak out against the voices that incite hatred and foment the attacks.


"The government is sitting silent while mobs try to kill human rights defenders and assault people they suspect are gay," said Dipika Nath, researcher in the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender (LGBT) rights program at Human Rights Watch. "Inaction is complicity, and silence can be lethal."
In late January, 2010, unsubstantiated rumors about a "gay wedding" scheduled for February 12 started circulating in Mtwapa, in Kilifi District. Local and national radio stations picked up the unconfirmed story. On February 7, several imams and muftis (Islamic scholars) told their congregations during Friday prayers to be vigilant and to "expose" homosexuals in Mtwapa.


On February 11, Sheikh Ali Hussein of the Council of Imams and Preachers of Kenya and Bishop Lawrence Chai of the National Council of Churches of Kenya held a news conference. As reported by Daily Nation and by other witnesses who have spoken to Human Rights Watch, the two religious leaders demanded an investigation of the Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), a government health center that provides HIV/AIDS services to the community. They criticized the government for "providing counselling services to these criminals" and demanded that the KEMRI office in Mtwapa be shut down, the reports said.


Local activists told Human Rights Watch that, in a statement after the meeting, the religious leaders promised to "flush out gays." The Daily Nation reported that Chai is the leader of a network called "Operation Gays Out," whose actual numbers and aims are not known.


On February 12, an armed mob of 200 to 300 people surrounded the KEMRI health center. Witnesses told Human Rights Watch that a man called "Faridi," an organizer of the mob, said a KEMRI staff member was homosexual because he wore a T-shirt promoting safer sex. In response, police who were at the scene took him and another KEMRI staffer into custody.


Earlier the same day, Faridi, with police, forcibly entered another private individual's home, claiming that the two people in the house were homosexual. Police took the two into custody, too. Local activists have informed Human Rights Watch that none of the men were charged and they have all since been released, and that the police were attempting to protect them from violence by taking them into custody.


The mob beat senseless another man who was approaching the health center and was about to set him on fire when the police arrived and took him into custody as well.


A large crowd gathered outside the police station where the five were being held. A religious leader addressed the mob, saying all homosexuals should be driven out of Mtwapa, and another speaker encouraged the mob to not bother bringing homosexuals to the police but rather to take the law into its own hands, witnesses said. Other speakers said that homosexuals had appeared in Mtwapa when KEMRI opened its offices there. Smaller groups reportedly went to the homes of other people suspected of being gay and threatened them.


Local sources told Human Rights Watch that the mob attacks appeared planned rather than spontaneous.  According to reports received by Human Rights Watch, none of the attackers have been arrested.


Accounts of the attacks and arrests filled the front pages of the next day's local and national newspapers.


A mob attacked and severely beat up another KEMRI volunteer on February 13, and the police again took the victim into custody. The same day, a person was beaten up in Mombasa on suspicion of being gay, and a second person was attacked in Mombasa on February 16. Local activists are attempting to determine the condition and whereabouts of those victims.


Sheikh Ali Hussein declared on the radio on February 17 that Muslims would march in Mtwapa on February 19 to protest against homosexuality. Local activists fear the demonstration may extend to mosques along the coast, including in Mombasa .


"The police need to arrest the attackers and put a halt to what appears to be a coordinated nationwide attack on people perceived to be homosexual," Nath said. "The disruption of lifesaving HIV/AIDS work could mean a public health catastrophe as well as a human rights disaster."


The attacks and hate-mongering and the government's failure to act have spread fear in the lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender community, Human Rights Watch said. Several people have gone into hiding; others are preparing to flee their homes at a moment's notice.


The attacks on the health center risk exacerbating the HIV/AIDS epidemic not only among men who have sex with men, but among all Kenyans.  HIV prevalence in Kenya is more than 16 percent, and more than 1.5 million Kenyans have died from HIV/AIDS-related illness.


Vigilante violence and panic promote an atmosphere in which any discussion of sexuality will be silenced, and vulnerable populations driven underground, Human Rights Watch said. KEMRI's Mtwapa offices have been closed since the attacks. There are plans to reopen the center, but KEMRI staff remain nervous about further attacks.


Although the declared reason for the six men's detention was to protect them, news reports said authorities asked the men to submit to forensic examinations to determine if they are homosexual. Five of them refused and the sixth consented and was examined, although no "evidence" of homosexuality is reported to have been found. Forensic medical examinations to "prove" homosexual conduct are archaic and discredited. If conducted without genuine consent, they may constitute torture or inhuman or degrading treatment, Human Rights Watch said.


Chapter V of the Constitution of Kenya guarantees to all Kenyans the rights to life, liberty, security of person, and privacy (articles 70, 71, and 72); articles 79, 80, and 81 protect individuals' freedom of expression, association and assembly, and movement. Article 82 protects against discrimination and states that "no law shall make any provision that is discriminatory either of itself or in its effect."


Section 162 of the Kenyan Penal Code punishes "carnal knowledge... against the order of nature" with up to 14 years in prison. This law is a relic of Kenya 's colonial past, as Human Rights Watch has previously reported. British colonizers imposed laws to control social and sexual conduct, though some political and religious leaders now defend them as part of "authentic" culture and tradition.


The Penal Code's provisions contravene not only constitutional protections but international human rights standards. Article 2 of the African Charter on Human and People's Rights prohibits discrimination on all grounds; articles 3 and 19 secure for all the right to equality; articles 5 and 6 guarantee the right to dignity and liberty; and articles 10 and 11 guarantee freedom of association and assembly.


The United Nations Human Rights Committee, which authoritatively interprets the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and evaluates states' compliance with its provisions, found in the 1994 case of Toonen v. Australia that laws criminalizing consensual homosexual conduct among adults violate the ICCPR's protections for private life and against discrimination. Further, article 9 of the ICCPR secures for all the right to liberty, security, and rights against arbitrary detention, and article 7 of the UN Declaration on Human Rights Defenders specifically secures the right to "develop and discuss new human rights ideas and principles and to advocate their acceptance."


The report of the special representative of the secretary-general on human rights defenders to the UN General Assembly specifically identifies human rights defenders from lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and intersex communities as being at particular risk and calls for greater state vigilance in protecting their rights.

 

Scientists at AIDS meeting urge HIV prevention for long-term couples in Africa

By David Brown
Washington Post Staff Writer
February 18, 2010

SAN FRANCISCO -- HIV continues to spread among couples in long-term relationships in sub-Saharan Africa because health authorities focus instead on the risks posed by casual sexual encounters, especially in young people. As a result, few HIV-prevention strategies have been devised for this overlooked population.

Those are among the conclusions reached by scientists presenting research at the 17th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic Infections, the annual mid-winter AIDS meeting in the United States . The failure to recognize how much HIV-transmission has occurred over decades in seemingly low-risk couples is "tragic," said epidemiologist Rebecca Bunnell of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, who worked in Uganda and Kenya for 14 years.

"It undoubtedly has resulted in millions of deaths and has produced millions of orphans," she told the more than 4,000 researchers gathered here.

Only as HIV testing has become more common in Africa in the past few years have health authorities come to appreciate the vast number of "discordant couples," in which one partner is HIV-positive and the other isn't.

For example, in the East African nation of Kenya , about 1 in 10 couples is affected by HIV. In 40 percent of those couples, both partners are infected. But in 60 percent -- about 340,000 couples -- only one partner is.

The likelihood that an infected person will pass the virus to a partner depends on many things. The risk decreases if the man is circumcised. Female-to-male transmission is less likely than male to female. In many cases, the infected partner in a discordant couple became infected before the current relationship or marriage began, and many HIV-affected couples remain discordant for years.

The problem is that most people do not know their HIV status. In particular, many people in stable relationships have never gone for testing because they perceive themselves to be at low risk for becoming infected.

A 2007 study that tested the blood of a representative sample of 16,000 Kenyans between the ages of 15 and 64 found that only 15 percent of infected people knew they had the virus. The fraction of HIV-affected couples in which partners know each other's status is even lower -- only 9 percent. In co-habiting couples, use of condoms, which could greatly lower the risk of transmitting the virus, is very low -- about 5 percent.

The consequence is that many of the continent's new infections occur among long-standing couples (albeit sometimes with the virus being introduced through an outside liaison). In Uganda , 65 percent of recent infections occur in married people. Furthermore, when one partner in an HIV-affected couple dies, that often opens new chances that the virus will be passed to others. In Zimbabwe , 8 to 17 percent of new HIV infections are attributed to the sexual activity of widows or widowers.

Prevention campaigns that focus on couples and partner testing -- with a counselor present when the status of each is revealed -- are one strategy for addressing this problem. But that, in turn, could become a new impediment to testing, some experts say.

"The message has to be very carefully crafted," said Wafaa El-Sadr, an AIDS researcher at Columbia University who helps run prevention programs in 14 African countries. "You want to encourage people to come as couples, but you never want to turn anybody away just because they come alone."

 

Cuts threaten future of HIV respite centre opened by Diana

16 February 2010

By MICHAEL BLACKLEY

COMPASSIONATE: Princess Diana talks to a patient during a visit to Milestone House in 1991
COMPASSIONATE: Princess Diana talks to a patient during a visit to Milestone House in 1991

A RESPITE centre for HIV sufferers that was opened by Diana, Princess of Wales, is being awarded a civic reception by the city council at the same time as its future is threatened by a massive cut in funding.

Milestone House was one of the first centres in the UK to offer specialist care to people with HIV and Aids and was officially opened in 1991 by the Princess of Wales as part of her campaign to break down the stigma of the disease.

The city council has agreed to hold a civic reception in the City Chambers to mark the 21st anniversary of Waverley Care, the charity that runs the Oxgangs respite centre. However, councillors have approved a plan to save £266,000 by shaking up the way care is provided.

Council chiefs are proposing withdrawing funding for Milestone House's eight remaining beds in order to instead focus on support at home and enhancing existing day care services.

But bosses at Milestone House – the only facility of its kind in Scotland – insist that a respite facility is needed for people who are victimised for having the disease.

Conservative councillor Jason Rust, who represents the ward that includes Oxgangs and proposed the motion calling for a civic reception, said:

"The effect of not having a respite service would be prolonged homelessness, greater hospital admissions and public health risks."

Under the council's proposals, it will no longer block purchase the eight residential beds at Milestone House – which would lead to it being shut down.

The UK government is currently predicting 10 per cent annual increases in HIV infection rates, while successful drug treatments mean sufferers are living longer.

David Johnson, director of Waverley Care, said: "The main issue is with those who don't want to spend time in their own homes because they are not supported. We don't have an argument with the need to maximise care at home; we agree, but there is also a group of people who if they don't have this facility will end up either spending more time in hospitals or isolated in their own homes."

Councillor Paul Edie, the city's health leader, said talks are continuing about funding.


[Home]  [Previous news]