News (Updated
March 21, 2010)
[Home]
[Previous
news]
BMJ Group, Friday 19 March
2010
Acupuncture
can carry a risk of serious infections and should be regulated more closely, say
experts from the
What is acupuncture?
Acupuncture is a
traditional Chinese treatment. It's a type of complementary or alternative
medicine, and involves having thin needles put into your skin. People try
acupuncture for all sorts of conditions, from irritable bowel syndrome to back
pain to infertility.
Traditional acupuncturists
believe that acupuncture improves the flow of 'Qi' energy around the body. Some
modern doctors think that putting needles in the skin could encourage the
release of natural chemicals that block pain and help you feel relaxed. However,
another theory is that any benefits come from the placebo effect, and from the
fact that the circumstances of treatment are often quite relaxing.
Some trials have failed to
find a difference between traditional acupuncture and sham acupuncture, which
avoids traditional acupuncture points or uses spring-loaded needles that don't
pierce the skin.
What could the harms be?
According to specialists
in microbiology at the
Professor Patrick Woo and
his colleagues describe more than 50 reports from around the world of infections
after acupuncture, mostly because the patient's skin wasn't properly
disinfected. Skin infections seem to be the most common problem, but there have
been cases of deeper infections affecting joints or the tissues around the
heart, spine, or brain.
There has been an isolated
report of an acupuncture patient being infected with an antibiotic-resistant 'superbug'
(methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, or MRSA). The patient needed
surgery to remove an infected joint and six months of treatment with strong
antibiotics.
Worldwide, there have been
five outbreaks of hepatitis B associated with acupuncture, with more than 80
people affected. The most common cause was improperly sterilised reusable
needles. It's theoretically possible that HIV could be transmitted by
acupuncture, and there have been suspected cases of HIV passed on in this way,
but no confirmed cases.
Although serious problems
after acupuncture are rare, Professor Woo says that many patients with minor
side effects may never seek medical help, meaning we don't know how common
milder problems really are. Doctors may miss the connection with acupuncture
when they see an infection, especially if there's been a long incubation period
after the acupuncture treatment.
How worried should I be?
While it's clear that
serious problems can happen after acupuncture, the cases Professor Woo and his
colleagues describe are collected from all over the world, and some go back to
the 1970s. Serious problems don't seem to be common, and acupuncture in
rigorously sterile conditions is unlikely to put you at risk.
The British Acupuncture
Council, one of the
Do we need tighter
controls?
Professor Woo and his
colleagues argue that acupuncturists need to observe infection control measures,
such as using disposable needles, skin disinfection procedures, and aseptic
techniques. They also call for stricter regulation and accreditation of
acupuncturists.
What's the situation in
the
There are several bodies
that regulate acupuncturists in the
What should I do if I want
to have acupuncture?
If you're considering
acupuncture, make sure your practitioner is registered with an organisation like
the British Acupuncture Council, which has a safe practice code for its 3,000 or
so members. This code specifies the use of pre-sterilised disposable needles,
sterile skin cleaning equipment, and surgical gloves. There are also other
professional bodies for acupuncturists with similar requirements.
You should also check that
the person treating you has professional indemnity insurance.
From:
Woo PCY, Lin AWC, Lau SKP,
et al. Acupuncture transmitted infections. BMJ. Published online 18 March 2010.
© BMJ Publishing Group Limited
("BMJ Group") 2010
ANI, Mar 20, 2010

Acne drug may help prevent
HIV breakout (Getty Images)
A cheap acne drug that's
been used for decades effectively targets infected immune cells in which HIV,
the virus that causes AIDS, lies dormant and prevents them from reactivating and
replicating, claim Johns Hopkins researchers.
The drug, minocycline, likely will improve on the current treatment regimens of
HIV-infected patients if used in combination with a standard drug cocktail known
as HAART (Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy), according to research published
now online and appearing in print April 15 in The Journal of Infectious Diseas
es.
“The powerful advantage to using minocycline is that the virus appears less
able to develop drug resistance because minocycline targets cellular pathways
not viral proteins,” says Janice Clements, Ph.D., Mary Wallace Stanton
Professor of Faculty Affairs, vice dean for faculty, and professor of molecular
and comparative pathobiology at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
“The big challenge clinicians deal with now in this country when treating HIV
patients is keeping the virus locked in a dormant state,” Clements adds.
“While HAART is really effective in keeping down active replication,
minocycline is another arm of defense against the virus.”
Unlike the drugs used in HAART which target the virus, minocycline homes in on,
and adjusts T cells, major immune system agents and targets of HIV infection.
According to Clements, minocycline reduces the ability of T cells to activate
and proliferate, both steps crucial to HIV production and progression toward
full blown AIDS.
If taken daily for life, HAART usually can protect people from becoming ill, but
it’s not a cure. The HIV virus is kept at a low level but isn’t ever
entirely purged; it stays quietly hidden in some immune cells. If a person stops
HAART or misses a dose, the virus can reactivate out of those immune cells and
begin to spread.
The idea for using minocycline as an adjunct to HAART resulted when the
“Since minocycline reduced T cell activation, you might think it would have
impaired the immune systems in the macaques, which are very similar to humans,
but we didn’t see any deleterious effect,” says Gregory Szeto, a graduate
student in the Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine working in the
Retrovirus Laboratory at
Ekaterina
Starshaya
On March 19, a new study
to be published in the Journal of Biological Chemistry, scientific journal,
concluded that banana lectins, a naturally occurring chemical, has the ability
to stop the transmission and prevention of HIV.
This novel research from
the University of Michigan Medical School found BanLec, "a jacalin-related
lectin isolated from the fruit of bananas, a potential component for an
anti-viral microbicide that could be used to prevent the sexual transmission of
HIV-1. BanLec is an effective anti-HIV lectin and is similar in potency to T-20
and maraviroc, two anti-HIV drugs currently in clinical use."
Michael D. Swanson, a
doctoral student in the graduate program in immunology at the University of
Michigan Medical School and lead author of the study, said "the problem
with some HIV drugs is that the virus can mutate and become resistant, but
that's much harder to do in the presence of lectins. Lectins can bind to the
sugars found on different spots of the HIV-1 envelope, and presumably it will
take multiple mutations for the virus to get around them."
According to
David Marvovitz, M.D.,
professor of internal medicine at the
March 15, 2010
Onome Akpogheneta
In a recent article describing
progress towards an HIV/AIDS vaccine, Herbert Virgin and Bruce Walker
commented that the HIV/AIDS biomedical research community “still lack(s)
fundamental knowledge regarding the nature, quality and quantity of immune
responses that should be induced” for successful vaccination. Defining
appropriate viral proteins for vaccination is also problematic, as is
determining “whether preventative vaccine strategies should focus on
protection from infection or protection from disease progression”. With so
many “knowable unknowns”, HIV/AIDS remains an ongoing global challenge.
Since the identification
of the viral infection in the early 1980s, an estimated 60 million people have
been infected with HIV and 20 million are thought to have died as a result of
AIDS.
Low HIV sexual
transmission rates (less than 1% of HIV exposures lead to infection) are
thought to increase significantly during acute phases of the infection when
viral loads are elevated, and one third of infants born to HIV infected
mothers acquire the infection.
Virgin and Walker focused
upon immunological knowledge and tools for vaccine design, suggesting that in
their absence, the route to a successful HIV/AIDS vaccine may be elusive and
distant. It remains possible that a viable vaccine could emerge as a surprising
success from vaccine trials. Even with success, a viable HIV/AIDS vaccine will
likely not be 100% effective; recent promising trials in
Current estimates suggest
that over 7,000 new HIV infections occur daily around the world. The
heaviest HIV/AIDS disease burden (71%) is in Sub-Saharan Africa, but prevalence
continues to rise in many areas of the world including Eastern Europe and
“It’s not enough to
simply funnel more funding into current AIDS research efforts” commented the
authors. Resonant also was the call to those working in the field of HIV
research to learn from others with relevant expertise. The authors suggest that
“there is no lack of enthusiasm among scientists outside the HIV field to get
involved in HIV/AIDS related research; rather there is merely a lack of a way
in”.