News (Updated
August 1, 2010)
[Home]
[Previous
news]
The new gel would be a
huge benefit to African women bearing the brunt of the AIDS pandemic.
Jul 19, 2010 AFP
Scientists on Monday
reported a major stride towards a vaginal gel that can thwart HIV, a goal that
would be a huge benefit to African women bearing the brunt of the AIDS pandemic.
A prototype cream tested
in
The study coincided with
the six-day 18th International AIDS Conference, which opened in
The results must now be
validated in a third, wider phase in the arduous process of assessing a new
medication for safety and effectiveness.
Although several questions
have yet to be answered, the findings are a bright ray of hope in the 29-year
campaign against acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), the researchers
said.
"Without this gel, we
may see 10 women becoming infected in a year. With this gel, we would see only
six women becoming infected," said Salim Abdool Karim, one of the two
leading co-researchers, in a teleconference with reporters.
Twenty-five million people
have died from AIDS and more than 33 million others today are infected by HIV,
which causes the disease.
More than two-thirds of
these live in sub-Saharan
One of the big vectors of
transmission is through coercive intercourse by an infected partner who is
unwilling to wear a condom.
The gel that was tested
contains a one-percent formulation of tenofovir. It is a frontline component in
the "cocktail" of antiretroviral drugs that disrupt HIV reproduction
in immune cells.
Previous microbicides that
have been tested have not contained an antiretroviral, and have had either a
very low level of protection or even boosted the risk of infection.
Over nearly three years,
the gel was tested among 445 HIV-negative women, while 444 counterparts received
a harmless lookalike called a placebo.
They were then tested for
HIV at monthly follow-up visits, where they were also given counselling in safe
sex, access to condoms and treatment for sexually-transmitted disease.
Each participant was asked
to insert, using a vaginal applicator, a first dose of the gel within 12 hours
before sex followed by a second dose as soon as possible but within 12 hours
afterwards, said co-leader Quarraisha Abdool Karim, also of the Centre for the
AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa (CAPRISA) in
Compared to the placebo
group, the gel reduced the risk of HIV infection by 39 percent overall, but by
54 percent among women who adhered to the instructions most faithfully.
There was no increase in
side effects, nor -- among women who became infected with HIV -- any sign that
they were more resistant to tenofovir as a result of the gel.
Despite this good news,
the scientists said they still had to tackle several important issues.
One is why the gel seemed
to be less effective after about 18 months.
This may be due to
weakened adherence to the cream, they suggested. About 40 percent of the women
in the trial used the microbicide less than one time out of two.
The trial was conducted in
an urban setting (Durban) and a rural setting (Pietermaritzburg) KwaZulu-Natal
province, enrolling sexually active women aged 18 to 40 considered to be of high
risk of exposure to HIV.
It was a so-called IIb
trial, meaning that it had passed earlier scrutiny for safety and effectiveness,
but was still relatively small compared to a Phase III test involving several
thousand volunteers.
The study, published by
the journal, Science, was to be the focus of a seminar on Wednesday at the world
AIDS forum.
If -- eventually -- the
gel is approved for use, it will join a small but growing arsenal of
preventative tools against HIV.
For a long time, the
condom was the only method that had a confirmed high degree of protection from
HIV in intercourse.
Four years ago, it was
joined by male circumcision. Removal of the foreskin, which contains cells that
are vulnerable to penetration by HIV, can reduce HIV risk by more than half, but
only for men and not for women.
Availability of a
microbicide that is 60 percent effective would avert two and a half million
infections over three years, according to a 2003 mathematical study.
by Jon Cohen on July 29,
2010

Scientists have argued
about the origin of the AIDS epidemic since it surfaced in 1981, but this much
is widely accepted today: Sometime around 1931, HIV-1, the main virus driving
the epidemic, likely entered humans from chimpanzees, which are infected with a
related virus called SIVcpz. The chimp virus, in turn, is a blend of SIVs from
two different monkey species.
Less clear is when the
monkey viruses moved into chimpanzees. Last year, one prominent investigator in
the origin field, evolutionary biologist Michael Worobey of the
Skeptics, including
virologist Preston Marx of the
Marx and his team
collected samples of SIV in dead monkeys on
As it turned out, the SIV
from the drills closely matches SIV from red-capped mangabeys, one of the two
contributors to SIVcpz. So an ancestor of this drill could have infected
chimpanzees. According to Marx's analysis, a virus related to the
Worobey's earlier studies
did not date the origin of SIV itself but suggested that it was "relatively
young." Others have argued that the SIVs emerged millions of years ago. The
new analysis of all four monkey species suggests that, at a minimum, the SIVs
are 76,000 years old—although Marx suspects that they evolved far earlier.
This longer history of primates harboring the viruses may explain why SIVs cause
no harm in the African monkeys they infect, Marx noted: The hosts have had more
time to evolve appropriate immune responses or cellular changes that make them
less vulnerable to the viruses. (Recent reports strongly indicate that SIVcpz
can cause AIDS in chimpanzees.)
"The data are
excellent," says Simon Wain-Hobson, a virologist at the Pasteur Institute
in
Paul Sharp, an
evolutionary biologist at the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom who
first described the SIVs that led to SIVcpz, has more confidence that the new
findings will hold up to scrutiny. "Molecular-clock analyses have suggested
that the SIVs arose within the last few thousand years," he says.
"These
by Jon Cohen on July 20,
2010
"It's very
interesting and clearly needs to be followed," says Zeda Rosenberg, who
heads the International Partnership for Microbicides, a nonprofit based in
Quarraisha and Salim
Abdool Karim, the husband-and-wife team who led the study, called CAPRISA 004,
presented the bulk of the data during an afternoon session today. As Salim
explained, nearly half of the women did not have HSV-2 infection at the start of
the study. Of this group, 58 of 224 women in the placebo arm of the study became
infected with HSV-2 versus 29 of the 202 who received the gel. The difference,
51%, was statistically significant, and the microbicide's effect on HIV
infection was independent of the HSV-2 finding, noted Salim Abdool Karim.
The finding is especially
heartening because HSV-2 infection increases a person's risk of becoming
infected by HIV-1. "Once confirmed and replicated, tenofovir gel has the
potential to alter the course of the HIV epidemic," said Salim Abdool Karim.
As he explained, a
precursor compound to tenofovir actually is a marketed drug to treat HSV-2
infection. But few AIDS researchers knew the connection, and many were stunned
that tenofovir had such a powerful impact on HSV-2.
"It goes to show that
sometimes you learn unexpected things from well-designed science projects,"
says Robert Grant of the
Clinical trials hint that
treatment strategy is not a dead end.
Alison Abbott
The
world buzzed last week with news that an antiretroviral gel can halve the
incidence of HIV infection in women (see Nature doi:10.1038/news.2010.363;
2010).
But a quieter buzz could
be heard at the International AIDS Conference (AIDS 2010) in
Normal vaccines are
designed to prevent infections, but so far none has worked for HIV. Therapeutic
vaccines, in contrast, aim to treat infected people — in the case of HIV, by
boosting ravaged immune systems. Initial clinical trials in the 1990s were
disappointing, however, and the vaccines fell from scientific fashion.
Drug combinations that
decrease viral concentrations have become the main method of treating HIV, but
they do not completely suppress the underlying disease. "They leave
patients with a level of harmful immune activation, which can cause premature
ageing," says Joep Lange, a clinical virologist from the
Lange is encouraged by the
trial results, but cautions that the trials so far are small, and that even if
the vaccines work they will never replace drugs. Some key AIDS researchers
continue to believe that therapeutic vaccines will not prove helpful in the long
run.
All of the vaccines, which
were developed by several small biotechnology companies, modestly but
significantly reduced viral levels in the blood of patients, who responded for
months or longer. In some cases, the vaccines also increased levels of CD4+ T
cells — the vital immune-regulator cells that HIV depletes. In theory, the
vaccines would only need to be administered every few months.
Two of the phase II trials
reported at the meeting focused on improving the efficiency of the immune
system's dendritic cells. These are the cells that present foreign antigens —
in this case, HIV proteins — to T cells so that they can recognize and
eliminate the invaders.
“You can’t shut doors
when options are so limited.”
One approach, developed by
Genetic Immunity, a biotechnology company based in
The other tactic, from
Argos Therapeutics of Durham, North Carolina, relies on tailor-made vaccines for
each patient. The researchers extracted dendritic cells and viral RNA from
patients, then loaded the cells with the RNA before putting them back into the
same patient.
Therapeutic vaccines are
normally tested in patients who are already undergoing drug treatment. To avoid
the drugs confounding the results, patients are required to take a drug
'holiday' for the few months of the trial. But a placebo-controlled clinical
trial by FIT Biotech of Tampere, Finland, broke with that model by recruiting 60
patients in
The FIT vaccine comprises
a combination of gene fragments designed to make the patient immune to six viral
proteins. In around 80% of patients receiving treatment, the virus was
suppressed and CD4+ levels were maintained two years after therapy began.
The results are
particularly relevant to countries such as
"But you can't shut
doors when options are so limited," she says.
The ultimate value of the
vaccines will only become clear as larger phase III trials roll out over the
next few years. For now, leaders in AIDS research are cautious about the
results. Anthony Fauci, director of the US National Institute of Allergy and
Infectious Diseases (NIAID) in
But the Maryland-based
advocacy group National Association of People with AIDS, whose vice-president of
community affairs, Stephen Bailous, organized the special session, has
championed the approach. "We need to have hopes and some of the therapeutic
vaccines look really promising," says Bailous. "If we can't raise our
hopes there, then where?"

Malaria is spread by
mosquito bites
Helen Puttick, Health
Correspondent
29 Jul 2010
More travellers fell ill
with malaria in
The number of cases
increased by 19% to 44, reversing a previous drop in diagnoses.
The same trend was noticed
across the
Dr Kitty Smith, medical
lead for surveillance agency Health Protection Scotland, said the rise could be
a “blip”.
There is hope that
publicity surrounding Cheryl Cole, the pop star and X Factor judge who
contracted malaria during a holiday in Tanzania, will raise awareness among
young travellers about the importance of protecting themselves.
Smith said: “We do know
that when a disease is highlighted in the media or when a celebrity –
particularly one who appeals to the age group who are most vulnerable –
catches a disease, it does have an effect. It has done in the past with diseases
such as HIV.
“We have had comments to
us from travellers saying they found out about malaria because they saw Cheryl
Cole had the condition. So from a very anecdotal point of view and past
experience, it is quite likely that it will have an impact.”
Malaria is spread by
mosquito bites and symptoms include a fever, sweating and shivering, aching
muscles and a headache. It is potentially fatal.
July 30, 2010
Debra Black
A
scientist who heads the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
believes he may have found a key to how HIV manages to break through and infect
a single cell.
It may all come down to a
protein that acts as a receptor on CD4+ T-cells, said Dr. Anthony Fauci,
director of the NIAID and a highly respected AIDS researcher, in an interview
with the Star.
This protein – known as
alpha 4 beta 7 – allows HIV to bind to the cells that are found beneath the
vaginal and rectal mucosa. Then the virus begins replicating, explained Fauci.
Fauci, who discussed the
discovery at a plenary session of the AIDS Conference in
His was just one of
several breakthroughs that have occurred in recent months, including work by
fellow NIAID researcher Dr. Gary Nabel and Dennis Burton, director of the
International AIDS Vaccine Initiative’s Neutralizing Antibody Consortium and a
scientist at The Scripps Research Institute.
Nabel, the institute’s
director of vaccine research, has found three antibodies that protect against a
wide range of AIDS viruses. In a Reuters story, Nabel said that two of the
antibodies attach to and neutralize 90 per cent of the various mutations of the
human immunodeficiency virus that causes AIDS.
Meanwhile,
The work of these three
scientists may have long-term and profound implications for the development of a
vaccine, something that has eluded researchers for many years.
“We’ve had so many
disappointments with the HIV vaccine,” Fauci said. Most scientists, he added,
are treading cautiously.
“I hope it will help
open new vistas for vaccines,” he said of his discovery.
Researchers up until now
have focused on developing a vaccine that would fight the various strains of
HIV. Nothing has worked.
“HIV exists as a swarm
of viruses that differ from each other even though they are all HIV,” Fauci
said. “What is in your body changes and differentiates over time. It diverges
from the original virus.”
Fauci suggests that his
discovery might allow scientists to begin to build a vaccine against the
transmitting virus and the site where the initial infection occurs.
Study suggests greater
heart attack risk associated with protease as opposed to integrase inhibitors
David Binning (Australian
Life Scientist)
30 July, 2010
A study by Sydney
researchers showing that the protease inhibitor type of HIV drugs carry a
greater risk of heart attack than the new integrase inhibitor family of drugs is
expected to lead to a greater understanding of the disease and how to treat it.
Associate Professor
Katherine Samaras and Professor Andrew Carr at the Garvan Institute of Medical
Research and
Ritonavir has been linked
to numerous metabolic complications including higher fasting levels of
cholesterol, while Raltegravir is known to have fewer metabolic effects.
The study involved 20
people, one half taking ritonavir and the other Raltegravir, who were measured
after eating for different blood fat levels; a key indicator of heart attack
risk. The researchers found that after one month, ritonavir caused
“significantly higher” levels of the atherosclerosis-inducing LDL
cholesterol after a meal, compared to raltegravir.
A unique aspect of the
study was that it involved people without the HIV infection, allowing the
researchers to more clearly ascertain the effects of the drugs without
interference with other medications or the disease itself.
“While a few other
studies have investigated post-meal blood fat and sugar metabolism, this is the
most comprehensive study of the post-meal metabolic response with these
medications to-date,´ said Associate Professor Samaras.
“About half the heart
risk of protease inhibitor therapy has never been explained. Our findings of
higher post-meal LDL cholesterol after food may explain at least some of this
missing link in accelerated heart risk.”
The results represent an
important step towards improving the health and quality of life of HIV
sufferers.
“Our data may explain
why patients receiving protease inhibitors have rates of heart attack that are
higher than estimates derived from conventional heart disease risk calculators,
which only use fasting cholesterol values,” said Professor Carr
“HIV patients may
therefore need more aggressive management of heart disease risk than previously
appreciated.”
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Antigenics says it has
achieved positive results in an early stage human trial for a potential herpes
vaccine. A vaccine, if approved, would be a blockbuster pharmaceutical product
— 60 million Americans are infected with herpes simplex virus-2, more commonly
known as genital herpes.
Officials at the
Lexington-based company say the findings show that Antigenics’ proprietary
vaccine platform that is focused on so-called heat shock proteins, which are
found in all cells and play a role in helping the immune system to recognize
diseased cells. While the initial focus of development has been in HSV-2,
Antigenics says the technology platform can potentially be utilized for
treatment of many types of infectious diseases such as HIV, hepatitis, malaria
and tuberculosis.
The potential vaccine
would treat, not prevent, herpes. However the treatment, if effective, would
decrease transmission of the disease.
The phase 1 study included
35 patients who had tested positive for herpes simplex virus - 2. The study
showed that the majority of patients had two types of immune system responses to
the vaccine.