News (Updated April 17, 2011)

[Home]  [
Previous news]


Aid suspension threatens disease fight-Global Fund

Apr 11, 2011

BRUSSELS, April 11 (Reuters) - Donors' decision to suspend $180 million of aid to the Global Fund to fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria could hit efforts to combat the diseases, the fund's chief said on Monday.

Germany , Spain and Denmark temporarily stopped payments to the Geneva-based fund earlier this year after hearing reports donations had been misused.

The Global Fund said health authorities in recipient countries might fear donations were running out and rein in disease-fighting programmes.

"I think the money will be paid, but there will be a psychological effect," the fund's executive director Michel Kazatchkine told reporters in Brussels .

"If you are a health minister in a developing country, it will make you hesitate," he added before meeting European Development Commissioner Andris Piebalgs at the European Parliament.

The Global Fund has said $34 million is unaccounted for in four countries -- Djibouti , Mali , Mauritania and Zambia .

It has suspended further payments to those countries and set up an independent panel to review its financial controls.

The fund accounts for about a quarter of international financing to fight HIV and AIDS and the majority of global money to fight tuberculosis and malaria. (Reporting by Philip Blenkinsop, editing by Andrew Heavens)

 

Mongolia gays face uphill battle for acceptance

By Kitty Hamilton (AFP) 12 April, 2011

wpe5.jpg (12303 bytes)ULAN BATOR — When Zaya told her sisters five years ago that she was a lesbian, they berated her and asked her what was wrong with her. When her father found out, he responded with brutal violence.

"He came to me and beat me pretty bad. He asked if I was gay, if I was a lesbian. I was so scared I told him I wasn't," explains the 25-year-old with cropped black hair, who like many people in Mongolia goes by one name.

Zaya, who lives in the capital Ulan Bator , says while her mother and sisters have gradually accepted her sexual orientation, her father is not so understanding and she continues to hide the truth from him.

"We're scared of what will happen. He's an aggressive man, he just wouldn't understand," says Zaya, who wears a T-shirt with the slogan 'Let peace begin with me' on the back.

Zaya is not alone in her fear. Discrimination and abuse toward sexual minorities in Mongolia is widespread, according to a report presented to the UN Human Rights Council in November last year.

"Every aspect of their life is filled with discrimination," said Robyn Garner, executive director of the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Centre in Ulan Bator , Mongolia 's first non-governmental organisation for LGBT rights.

"There are very few people that don't have a tale to tell of discrimination and violence," said Garner, an Australian who has worked for gay rights in Mongolia for seven years.

There are no reliable data on the number of homosexuals in the country, which has a population of roughly 2.7 million, as many remain in the closet due to the social stigma associated with a gay lifestyle.

That mentality took root during the decades Mongolia spent as a Soviet satellite state. That period ended in 1990, but old habits are proving tough to break.

Several gay men have been brutally murdered in recent months, and the cases remain unsolved. Other homosexuals recount tales of abduction and sexual assault. Workplace violence and discrimination is also common, Garner says.

Language used in the Mongolian media adds to the prevailing social mindset, says Otgonbaatar Tsedendemberel, a veteran activist for LGBT rights.

"It commonly portrays us as sexual perverts and crazies. Most terminology is sensationalised," he said.

In 2009, the US government said in a rights report on Mongolia that some media had "described gay men and lesbians with derogatory terms and associated homosexual conduct with HIV/AIDS, paedophilia, and the corruption of youth."

The LGBT centre recently released a media style guide -- one aspect of their fight for social justice for sexual minorities.

But the group itself has faced an uphill battle. It took three years before the government accepted its official registration in December 2009.

One rejection letter from the justice ministry said the group's name "conflicts with Mongolian customs and traditions and has the potential to set the wrong example for youth and adolescents".

The group only gained acceptance when the human rights advisor to President Tsakhia Elbegdorj personally intervened.

Otgonbaatar says he is hopeful that things can change in Mongolia . One major step, he says, would be the introduction of anti-discrimination legislation to enhance the legal protection for sexual minorities.

Last month, more than 80 countries including Mongolia presented an initiative to the UN Human Rights Council urging the international community to end violence against homosexual, bisexual and transgender individuals.

But Garner -- whose group has recently launched a nationwide anti-discrimination awareness campaign -- says she knows that prevailing attitudes towards gays will not change overnight.

"Even if we get anti-discrimination law, we still need to see a change in the existing societal mindset," she said.

The attitude that homosexuality is largely a Western phenomenon is still prevalent, Otgonbaatar adds, laughing as he recalls someone telling him: "I thought it only existed in Hollywood movies."

"We want to keep LGBT rights in people's faces. I call it queer saturation," Garner said.

Zaya -- who spoke to AFP at the LGBT Centre, decorated with a large banner with a pink triangle and the word PRIDE -- says despite improved tolerance among Mongolians, especially in Ulan Bator , she still lives in fear.

Copyright © 2011 AFP.

 

Myanmar gays seek Thai-style acceptance

By Rob Bryan (AFP) – 17 April, 2011

YANGON — Tin Soe was just four when he realised he was different to other boys in his neighbourhood, but growing up in conservative and army-ruled Myanmar , he struggled to be accepted as gay by his relatives.

"My granddad's sister said that if I became a monk my sexuality would change. So I was a monk for three months, but my sexuality never changed," the 30-year-old said, asking for his real name to be withheld.

A repressive mix of totalitarian politics, religious views and reserved social mores has kept many gay people in the closet in Myanmar , formerly known as Burma .

Gay men have developed their own language as a "gaylingual" code to both signify and conceal their sexuality, said Tin Soe, who now works on HIV/AIDs prevention in Yangon.

"We want to be secret and we don't want to let other people know what we are saying. We twist the pronunciation."

It's a world away from neighbouring Thailand , where a lively gay and transsexual scene is a largely accepted part of society, which -- like Myanmar -- is mainly Buddhist.

"More Burmese are travelling to Thailand and see things there," said a 34-year-old working in Myanmar 's tourism industry. "But here gays are still looked down on, in a certain category."

Homosexuality is often linked to local religious beliefs about karma in Myanmar , Tin Soe said.

Many believe "we're gay because we did something in a past life, that in a past life I committed adultery or raped a woman. But I don't believe in that," he explained.

"It's not like Iran where they are killed, but gays are a strange story in this country."

Traditionally, the only area where non-heterosexuality has been openly embraced is the realm of "nat" or spirit worship, a form of animism that is intertwined with Myanmar 's Buddhist beliefs.

Flamboyant and effeminate spirit mediums take centre stage at popular "nat" festivals throughout the year, but their acceptance here has also served to reinforce certain stereotypes of gay people in Myanmar .

Same-sex relations are technically criminalised by a colonial penal code, and while this is no longer strictly enforced, activists say it is still used by authorities to discriminate and extort.

"They use it as an excuse to make money and harass people but they don't bring the cases to court," said Aung Myo Min, an openly gay Myanmar exile and director of the Human Rights Education Institute of Burma, based in Thailand .

He said there were numerous instances of sexual violence and humiliation of gay people in public.

"Many cases are not reported because the victims keep silent out of shame and fear of repercussions."

In a country under army control for nearly five decades, broaching any kind of anti-discrimination or human rights issue is hugely sensitive.

"The man who starts to ask for rights in the gay community will be sent to prison," said another Yangon-based HIV/AIDS activist in his fifties.

The Internet offers a forum for gay men to meet, deemed safer than public cruising: Tin Soe met his boyfriend on Facebook, for example, but he said many were afraid to put their photos on gay websites.

In light of such discretion, raising public health awareness isn't easy.

In some areas, such as the big cities of Yangon and Mandalay, as many as 29 percent of men having sex with men are HIV positive, according to a 2010 report by the Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS.

"We have a lot of activists in this country but we can't campaign very openly. We will have a workshop in a hotel but without big posters and loudspeakers. We do it low profile," said Tin Soe.

While lesbianism is also largely hidden in Myanmar , Aung Myo Min said it was more acceptable to the militarised and macho culture, in which many fail to differentiate between homosexual and transgender people.

"The woman who wants to be a man is excusable," he said.

A 52-year-old in Yangon said things had improved since his teenage years, when "people would use sling shots against us," but he warned there was still a long road ahead to a truly tolerant Myanmar .

"We want to be like Thailand , where gay people have equal chances," he said.

Copyright © 2011 AFP.

 

Health officials stymied in porn investigation

(AP) – 17 April, 2011

LOS ANGELES (AP) — Health officials say porn producers are dodging questions and slowing down an investigation into a case of HIV that shuttered production at several companies last year.

The Los Angeles Times reports that health officials are struggling to make headway on a probe, a process that is usually much more efficient when there is a disease outbreak.

In a report obtained by the newspaper, Dr. Francisco Meza says adult film companies refuse to cooperate with the investigation, and stage names for performers make it difficult to track down partners.

Adult film performer Derrick Burts came forward about his HIV diagnosis in October and says he had sex with 16 men and women.

Investigators are having trouble figuring out who those people are because production companies haven't provided identifying information.

Copyright © 2011 The Associated Press.

 

HIV-infected organs can save lives, doctors say

Lifting of ban would save lives of HIV-infected candidates as well as all patients waiting for organs, some health professionals argue

By Meredith Cohn, The Baltimore Sun

April 11, 2011

The nation has a huge need for kidneys, livers and other organs for transplant, but federal law has one absolute rule for donors: no HIV infections.

Some Johns Hopkins doctors now argue that HIV should not disqualify the organs from transplant into recipients who also are already infected with the virus.

"If this legal ban were lifted, we could potentially provide organ transplants to every single HIV-infected transplant candidate on the waiting list," says Dr. Dorry L. Segev, an associate professor of surgery at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine whose recent study concluded that there are 500 potential donors disqualified every year.

The ban was included in the National Organ Transplant Act of 1984, a time when the AIDS epidemic was new and the disease unknown, Segev said.

But now that HIV has become a chronic treatable disease rather than a death sentence, there appears to be growing consensus in the medical field that infected organs should be considered. Even some practitioners who have expressed concerns that HIV patients could become sicker are still calling for studies, and at least one set of Illinois doctors has pursued a change.

Segev and others say that lifting the ban wouldn't just benefit those with HIV, but everyone waiting for a transplant. More than 100,000 people are in need of organs, and up to 20 people a day die waiting for them, according to the United Network for Organ Sharing, the nonprofit that manages the nation's organ transplant system for the federal government.

Further, HIV-positive patients have for about a decade been successfully receiving healthy organs – about 130 kidneys and 40 livers in 2010. Doctors say that new livers are often needed by HIV-infected patients who also have hepatitis, and kidneys are needed by those who also have hypertension and diabetes or have complications from HIV or the antiretroviral drugs that control the virus.

A large study of HIV patients who receive uninfected organs is ongoing but doctors say early data show success similar to transplants in non-HIV infected patients.

Segev and other researchers found the 500 potential new donors blocked by the ban through data included in two national registries. The Nationwide Inpatient Study found an average of 534 each year between 2005 and 2008 and the HIV Research Network found and average of 494 each year between 2000 and 2008. Segev's findings were published online March 28 in the American Journal of Transplantation.

Many other doctors, bioethicists and lawmakers agree that the ban should be lifted. Illinois passed a law reversing a state ban in 2004, only to discover that it was not enforceable because of the federal ban.

To be sure, some practitioners have questions about using infected organs. They want to know if the organs would be healthy enough, if patients with well-controlled HIV would be infected with new, potentially aggressive strains of the virus and if there are safeguards for those without HIV.

Advising a slow approach is the HIV Medicine Association, which represents doctors and other health care professionals who focus on HIV. The group supports clinical trials to collect data before there is widespread use of infected organs.

Dr. Kathleen Squires, chairwoman of the group, said the ban should be lifted so the organs can be used in such trials.

The only information practitioners have now comes from South Africa , where a few transplants have been performed recently. But data have only been reported on four patients who had surgery in 2008 according to a report in the New England Journal of Medicine just two years later.

She said she believes there is broad support for more research, especially among those who work in the HIV field and see how medicine has turned the disease into a chronic condition. Those with HIV now have normal life spans, she said.

"The whole concept needs to be studied to see if the transplants can be done safely and effectively," said Squires, also director of the Division of Infectious Diseases at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital in Philadelphia . "I'm sure some people would ask why anyone would even think of doing that, but there is a clear reason, there's a shortage."

But others disagree that trials are necessary, including Dr. Gregory W. Rutecki, a bioethicist and kidney disease specialist at the University of South Alabama Medical School. He said patients who are facing death should be given the choice now.

He said those with hepatitis have a choice. Transplants from those with hepatitis to others with that disease have been done successfully for years, and he said similar steps and precautions could be taken with HIV donors and patients.

"Times have changed," he said. "Those with HIV are living long and very productive lives, and those that have received a transplanted organ are doing very well. Changing this rule would be a phenomenal decision ... and would only be controversial among lay persons who don't keep up with treatment of HIV."

In Illinois , the law reversing the ban was not controversial, said Dr. Michael Abecassis, chief of the division of organ transplantation at Illinois Northwestern Memorial Hospital and a driving force behind the change there. He said a politically connected patient took the idea to the legislature, which approved of the measure with large majorities. It was signed by then Gov. Rod Blagojevich.

Abecassis, also the president of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons, said when the governor asked who might oppose the change, "We said nobody. This wasn't a struggle at all."

After consultation with HIV specialists, he said that he believes existing antiretroviral medications would be effective against any strain introduced through an infected organ, and anyone who had developed drug resistance would be disqualified from donating organs. New clinical trials wouldn't be necessary, he said.

"It occurred to me that we waste a number of organs every year in this country," said Abecassis on the origins of the Illinois law. "Why can't we use HIV positive organs on HIV positive recipients? ...Those people could go right to the front of the list."

But a change in the statute is needed. A spokesman for the Health Resources and Services Administration, the government agency that oversees the organ donation system, said he was unaware of any lawmaker taking up the HIV ban. No other diseased donors, including those with cancer, are absolutely barred from donation if the organs are deemed suitable.

Segev said he'd like to take the issue to Capitol Hill. And at least one advocacy group is evaluating the next steps. That's the civil rights group Lamda Legal, which fought a decade ago for the rights of those with HIV to get transplants of healthy organs and still battles with states that continue to deny public funding for such transplants.

Scott A. Schoettes, the group's HIV Project director, said the group recently began learning about the federal ban and hasn't decided on measures — or even how hard such an effort would be.

"It wasn't a slam dunk at the beginning," he said about the original transplants in HIV patients. "And it lingers a decade from when the first transplant occurred."

But one thing is certain, said Schoettes, who is HIV positive. He would like to again register as an organ donor. "I don't have that option anymore and I welcome the possibility. I imagine others do, too."

Meredith.cohn@baltsun.com


[Home]  [Previous news]